Syzygy bundles on Picard rank one varieties need not be stable
Jihao Liu
AI-generated note · first shared privately with Supravat Sarkar on 14 July 2026 · posted here 21 July 2026 · not submitted to arXiv
Version 1 of Supravat
Sarkar’s paper brought Question 1.1 to my attention. Here
“independently” refers specifically to the construction: the counterexample
in this PDF was independently generated using the Danus system and sent to Supravat
Sarkar on 14 July 2026, before I saw or received a description of the distinct
counterexample or proof later included in
version 2 of Sarkar’s paper.
Since Sarkar’s v2 now gives a different counterexample to the same question,
I will not submit this note to arXiv. I am instead making the PDF available on my
personal webpage as a dated note, for the benefit of the community and for future
reference.
Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated manuscript. The proof has not
been verified by a human; readers should independently check every mathematical
claim before relying on or citing it.
Factorial asymptotics of the Matryoshka numbers
Jihao Liu
Note · June 2026
This note proves the conjecture of Kotěšovec on the factorial growth of the
Matryoshka numbers (OEIS A177384), which arise from the combinatorics of the
cosmohedron: the limit S = lim an/(n+4)!
exists and is finite and positive, so
an ∼ S n! n4,
and S is certified to lie in an explicit interval of width below 10−9.
The proof is elementary and independent of the resurgence approach, and the note was
produced by an automated proof system. It is made available here following a suggestion
of Professor Federico Ardila.
On a conjecture of Esser, Totaro, and Wang
Jihao Liu
Note · May 2026 · not posted to arXiv
This note disproves a conjecture of Esser and Totaro on the relative primeness
of two explicitly constructible integers. As a consequence, the large-index
conjecture of Esser, Totaro, and Wang fails in dimension 159: the prime 53
divides both E159 and m′159.
The note will not be posted to arXiv.